15 years helping British businesses
choose better software

What is eureQa?

eureQa is redefining the test automation platform. With support for functional, cross browser/device, mobile & performance testing, and synthetic monitoring in a single enterprise class Cloud platform, eureQa is enabling companies to effectively operate their digital businesses. Powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), the eureQa platform gives companies the tools they need to efficiently improve the user experience and overall application quality.

Who Uses eureQa?

Technology companies, enterprise SaaS vendors and digital enabled business or companies undergoing digital transformation in retail, wholesale, eCommerce, healthcare, insurance and other sectors.

eureQa Software - 1
eureQa Software - 2

Not sure about eureQa? Compare with a popular alternative

eureQa

eureQa

4.4 (20)
US$1,500.00
month
Free version
Free trial
35
No integrations found
4.2 (20)
4.2 (20)
4.8 (20)
VS.
Starting Price
Pricing Options
Features
Integrations
Ease of Use
Value for Money
Customer Service
No pricing found
Free version
Free trial
87
9
4.4 (8)
4.0 (8)
4.7 (8)
Green rating bars show the winning product based on the average rating and number of reviews.

Other great alternatives to eureQa

WebLOAD
Top rated features
No features have been rated by reviewers for this product.
BrowserStack
Top rated features
Mobile Testing
Software Testing Management
Supports Parallel Execution
ZeuZ
Top rated features
Parameterised Testing
Requirements-Based Testing
Test Script Reviews
Mr Suricate
Top rated features
Bug Tracking
Monitoring
Usability Testing
TAST
Top rated features
Monitoring
Reporting & Statistics
Version Control
Qyrus
Top rated features
No features have been rated by reviewers for this product.
Zebrunner
Top rated features
Monitoring
Virtuoso
Top rated features
No features have been rated by reviewers for this product.
HeadSpin
Top rated features
Hierarchical View
Parameterised Testing
Test Script Reviews

Reviews of eureQa

Average score

Overall
4.4
Ease of Use
4.2
Customer Service
4.8
Features
4.5
Value for Money
4.2

Reviews by company size (employees)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1,000
  • >1,001

Find reviews by score

5
40%
4
60%
Kenithe
Kenithe
QA Lead in US
Verified LinkedIn User
Biotechnology, 501–1,000 Employees
Used the Software for: 6-12 months
Reviewer Source

Excellent Automation Tool with great training

5.0 3 years ago

Comments: It has been one of the most positive experiences with automation I have had in my QA career.

Pros:

I like how flexible it is and the robustness of the reporting. We are primarily using it to run test cases that are data intensive and are tedious and time consuming run manually. We can get tests run in a few hours that would take weeks to run manually.

Cons:

Its not exactly a con but there are so many features it is not easy to figure out without the training or SME help.

Megha
QA Analyst in Australia
Hospital & Health Care, 501–1,000 Employees
Used the Software for: 2+ years
Reviewer Source

Good automation product.

4.0 3 years ago

Pros:

1. Easy to design scripts with selenium commands available in a select dropdown such as click, select and assert commands. Ability to have multiple locators for a single command in case we need to have for different locators for different browsers. 2. Cross browser testing is there which enables us to test our application on different browser versions. 3. Running tests in parallel on cloud which is big advantage to our framework as it reduces execution time and gives us the ability to provide application quality results fast enough. 4. Jira integration is a plus feature which helps linking jira issues with the runs and in turn gives us a consolidated report on what runs got affected by which tickets.

Cons:

Ability to create object repository feature is not available which makes the maintenance of the script little tough in scenarios when there is change in locator for an element.

eureQa Response

3 years ago

Megha, Thank you for your review. eureQa does have an implicit (internal) object repository that is automatically updated using the Magic Wand feature in QaSCRIBE. This eliminates the need to manually update element locators when your app changes.

Rohan
VP of Operations in US
Real Estate, 51–200 Employees
Used the Software for: 1+ year
Reviewer Source

An Efficient Way to Cut Down on UI Testing Overhead

4.0 3 years ago

Pros:

• Ability to record the web elements and re-execute. • Instant test validations post recording scenario by executing scripts. • Ability to edit scripts using element locator feature. • Ability to auto suggest various locators available for reaching the web element. • Rapid syntax reference for commands or instructions from knowledge base during scripting. • Ability to read parameterized test data from CSV and Excel. • Numerous scenarios creation by means of script re-usability feature. • Supporting various test environments with less script changes. • Cross browser testing support. • Simulating various devices for testing. • Screenshots, videos and test logs make it efficient to debug failed tests. • Auto re-executions with AI/ML for the failed scenarios. • Transaction details report provides the clear understanding of the test execution results. • Reliable automation outputs. • Significant extended support post the onboarding process.

Cons:

• Should be proficient to execute multiple scenarios in a single run definition for auto re-execution of failed scenarios. • System aborts should be captured accordingly in reports. • Incapable to capture the videos and network logs in Selenoid executions. • Execution timings, even via the high-volume Selenoid server, is not as quick as expected. • Buggy updates at times. • Does not always capture the real-time screenshot at exact failed instruction. • Not as cooperative in PDF file validations with chrome browser. • Reports count discrepancies for test results. • While extended support is offered, 24X7 is not. • Email test result notifications should be triggered post AI/ML executions. • Support through Microsoft Teams or Slack will be an extra advantage.

eureQa Response

3 years ago

Thank you for your response Rohan. Please note that eureQa does support Slack integration

Mehul
Global Head - Automation in Australia
Hospital & Health Care, 501–1,000 Employees
Used the Software for: 2+ years
Reviewer Source

The Vendor Client Relationship | An amazing bond !!

4.0 3 years ago

Pros:

1. eureQa's ability to support Functional Testing, Cross Browser/Device Testing, and Performance Testing. 2. eureQa's open API Framework to support custom client requirements 3. Easy to script, run, report, and maintain 4. An enterprise level security which allows us to test with confidence without worrying about cyber attacks and data breaches. 5. eureQa's ability to speed up test execution times with it's parallel execution framework

Cons:

eureQa software still requires enhancements which can add value to it's ever growing abilities. Functions like bulk actions and folder tree structures are still missing. But, eureQa's customer focused approach is well defined and highly appreciable. Team at eureQa has worked with us to get constant feedback on product and formed business cases to enhance product which not only helps us but to other clients too. I am sure with time, we will be able to get all these amazing enhancements in upcoming versions of eureQa.

eureQa Response

3 years ago

Thank you Mehul. Input from our users is an important part of our platform improvement process, and your feedback is very helpful.

Neslihan
QA Analyst in US
Civic & Social Organization, 201–500 Employees
Used the Software for: 1-5 months
Reviewer Source

The review:))

4.0 3 years ago

Comments: I thought it is easy during training, since I knew Selenium. It is still easy if I get more experience and knowledge in order to handle exceptions and how to use command effectively. I feel like Eureqa is great tool, since it offers to execute our tests in different device, and cross- browser testing

Pros:

I really like the way how system creates test script by capturing the step by our manual test. We can not perform Database and APi yet, but it is wonderful to be able to perform all type of testing with one product. We also can execute our test in different device and cross browser testing. This is the feature I like the most. Tagging and local execution also one my favorite, I also like the way how reports reflect our test runs.

Cons:

Trouble shooting and debugging is difficult. We should have got more information about how to handle frames, calendar, popup etc. in the training. When I check training document, I have seen that we only get initial training, there are more trainings for creating advance test scripts, database and API testing. I attend a booth camp and pay a lot of money to learn automation, 40 hours of class in a week and additional study on top of it for six months. I do not mind taking more training to learn automation, especially it is free. I wish we had more trainings to learn all of this. And lastly we could have better communication with EureQA team, since we have 12 hours different, I think it makes our communication harder.