MeetingPulse

Comments: Setting up an audience response with a variety of option is a breeze and the back-end is very powerful. The attendee experience is super slick on mobile web. We also integrated MeetingPulse with our EventMobi event app, and it worked seamlessly.

Pros: Easy to setup, lots of features and amazing attendee experience. Most features and settings are really well thought out and can be easily customized.

Cons: MeetingPulse is designed around the concept of a session, more so than a large event. On the other hand this makes it easy to setup by the admin/speaker or AV person. Perfect for use cases when most of the audience spend time together in one area/session.

Pros: Meetingpulse allows you to use polling, QA, and taking a "pulse" during a meeting or presentation that is easy to use for both an admin and a user. It's aesthetically pleasing and I was happy to see these capabilities just from the free version.

Cons: The software doesn't reliability integrate always with Powerpoint in the free version. I've reach out to customer support to see if it's user error (which it very well may be). I will update when resolved.

Comments: Great customer support, user friendly, easy to learn and teach

Pros: The ability to upload paperwork means all our team members received notices. It helped us relay information smoothly and efficiently.

Cons: We haven’t had any complaints yet. The onboarding team made things extremely easy to understand. This was much more efficient than other free trials for audience engagement tools in the market.

Comments: I would use this again, but I would use the extra available settings so that I could filter out inappropriate responses and also think about how to balance engagement with what will be productive for the learning outcomes I am after.

Pros: I loved how the software allows audience members to contribute in real time and use their mobile devices. It created a really engaging atmosphere.

Cons: The audience I was engaging was young and took the opportunity to essentially get a laugh from others by posting profanity. This was my fault. I should not have implemented it in this way.

Comments: We primarily wanted to use it as an engagement tool during training and conferences and it went well. I think the thing for me is to decide when to leverage it and when not to, as getting large audiences to log in can take a bit of time so it has to be value add and very interactive, instead of 1 or 2 questions.

Pros: I like how easy it is to set up. I didn't need a manual to get started and the support I received from the team was excellent.

Cons: I feel that it has a ton of potential, but that there are some features/integrations which might still be on the future roadmap that will really make the tool more mature in the next few years. Haven't checked in a bit but PowerPoint Integration may be great if it doesn't already exist?