What is Load Balancer Enterprise ADC?
When people rely on your business, downtime simply isn't an option. Talk to us about load balancing that's simple, unbreakable and designed around your system needs. We make it our business to understand yours, inside and out. And well be there every step of the way, to make sure your data keeps flowing so your business can too.
Who Uses Load Balancer Enterprise ADC?
Loadbalancer.org's diverse client base spans Fortune 50 companies to small and medium-sized businesses. Core sectors include Healthcare, Storage, Video, Print & Finance.
Where can Load Balancer Enterprise ADC be deployed?
Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Chromebook (Desktop)
About the vendor
- Loadbalancer.org
- Located in Wilmington, DE, US
- Founded in 2003
- Phone Support
- 24/7 (Live rep)
- Chat
Languages
English
Load Balancer Enterprise ADC pricing
Starting Price:
- Yes, has free trial
- No free version
Load Balancer Enterprise ADC does not have a free version but does offer a free trial. Load Balancer Enterprise ADC paid version starts at US$1,995.00/one-time.
Pricing plans get a free trialAbout the vendor
- Loadbalancer.org
- Located in Wilmington, DE, US
- Founded in 2003
- Phone Support
- 24/7 (Live rep)
- Chat
Languages
English
Load Balancer Enterprise ADC videos and images











Reviews of Load Balancer Enterprise ADC

Sean K.
Loadbalancer.org has been a great solution for Patra
Pros:
Runs on VMWare. Easy to configure. SSL offloading works great. Layer 4 and Layer 7 load balancing both work very well. We didn't have success with session stickiness with a couple of the other load balancers we tested. Was one of the main factors we chose the product. Support has been very good. Have not had a single failure of the software in over 4 years.
Cons:
NIC assignment on the VM host machine is not very clear. The last update we pushed broke all of our configs and we had to recreate manually.
Loadbalancer.org Response
3 years ago
Hi Sean. I would like to apologize for the issues you had when deploying our solution, specifically with NIC assignment. I passed your feedback onto our developers to look at ways of improving the NIC assignment in a future release.
Verified Reviewer
We purchased it from web and in notime with the help of support it was up and running
Comments: We are running dual server farm for end user computing and financial application. We were using 2x LoadBalancer as most of our users connect to windows servers from linux platform. Initially we started using this for Windows Terminal Servers and then we tweaked it bit further added other services available locally. Since it works on TCP services we were able to add multiple services in single platform. The comparing product was 10 times more expensive and providing very similar features. We found loadbalancer quite effective in terms of both cost and functionality.
Pros:
Based on Linux platform, it is robust and secure. And provide unlimited customization levels. You can actually request something to suit your organizational needs. You can run multiple services not limited to operating system e.g. you can run to loadbalance Windows Server Farm and Web applications simultaneously. you can introduce new servers in existing setup and take out old without any downtime
Cons:
Web UI to configure is bit complex , However the support is excellent and provide service promptly. Agent less there is not much information you can what going on target services
Roger S.
The WAF that can save your network
Comments: A very positive experience once we got the WAF to work properly. Our internal telephony network has never run this clean since installing the Loadbalancer.org WAF.
Pros:
The control it gives us to block unauthorized access into our network. The WAF rules are easy to create and the included firewall and per WAF blocking rules are terrific.
Cons:
Loadbalancer.org does not do proper WAF integration with all pieces of a Metaswitch Enhanced Application Server. As an end user we have to constantly write new rules to make the device work properly.
John W.
Such a Helpful Company
Comments: excellant, the loadbalancer appliance does exactly what the client purchased it for and the follow the sun 24 hour support is superb
Pros:
The Technical support is excellant, i had difficulty during a clients online upgrade of an enterprise VA Max Slave HA loadbalancer, I spoke to them uploaded support files and they provide me with a number of options to complete the upgrade. The upgrade is now complete and just needs downtime to failover and upgrade the Master appliance Thanks, great service as always
Cons:
online upgrade has a few gotchas, but works if you follow the guidelines completely - disable any screen saver or anything that could move you off the upgrading web page
Srikanth G.
Amazing product with stability and absolutely zero maintenance
Pros:
Amazing product with stability and absolutely less maintenance and effective one time setup . Glad to know there are providing Cloud based Load balancers as well. Without doubt would propose Cloud based load balancers for my customers.
Cons:
Improvements like multiple scheduling algorithms for distributing client load, All hosts in a cluster must be located in the same subnet, Cannot provide reverse proxy services functionality that is required for applications etc..
Loadbalancer.org Response
3 years ago
Srikanth, Thanks very much for your kind review. We often get some confusion with how we describe the deployment options for multiple subnets. Rest assured our products definitely support all deployment methods including reverse proxy and the backend servers can be on any routable network. Please don't hesitate to contact support to start a conversation about the available options - including our server-based adaptive feedback agent. Once again thanks very much for your review.