--- description: Discover the benefits and disadvantages of GitHub Copilot. Learn the software price, see the description, and read the most helpful reviews for UK business users. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHub Copilot Pricing, Cost & Reviews - Capterra UK 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Generative AI Tools](/directory/34155/generative-ai/software) > [GitHub Copilot](/software/1051539/copilot) # GitHub Copilot Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1051539/copilot Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1051539/copilot?page=2) > Copilot uses advanced AI algorithms to suggest code and entire functions to users in real-time, right from their editor. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 45 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses GitHub Copilot? Coders and Engineers ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 45 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Microsoft - **Location**: Redmond, US - **Founded**: 1975 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$0.00 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: United States ## Features - Content Generation - Data Augmentation - Natural Language Processing - Simulation and Scenario Generation ## Category - [Generative AI Tools](https://www.capterra.co.uk/directory/34155/generative-ai/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Blaze](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1056061/blaze) — 4.8/5 (723 reviews) 2. [Replit](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1051536/replit) — 4.4/5 (157 reviews) 3. [1min.AI](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1065472/1min-ai) — 4.7/5 (476 reviews) 4. [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1049484/chatgpt) — 4.4/5 (358 reviews) 5. [NightCafe](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1032973/nightcafe) — 4.7/5 (83 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Great product with integrations. Highly recommend" — 5.0/5 > **Tom** | *26 March 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: GitHub Copilot gives you the option to let it write code for you, or as I do more often than not, use it to Code Review my code. The interface is easy to use and their are a good number of tokens included at the free tier. There can choose from several models including Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini and more. It also embeds nicely with VSCode and PhpStorm. Customer support is great and Microsoft recently a free workshop in London to highlight how Copilot can be utilised. > > **Cons**: I don't really find many issues with GitHub Copilot. It is a very usable product and is understood my many developers. > > Overall, I think GitHub Copilot is a great addition not only to Github itself, but to the wider community with great IDE integration. ----- ### "Game changer" — 5.0/5 > **Stuart** | *31 December 2025* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The project level overview helps a lot with explaining context. In fact it cuts out the need altogether. > > **Cons**: The fact I run out of credit and even on free tier cannot use it to generate commit messages. This would be a really cool free tier option. > > I used it when it first came out and had to describe context and the project as a whole but then they quickly gave it project awareness. I also use codex with it separately and probably just about prefer codex ----- ### "Sparks creativity and saves time" — 5.0/5 > **Amr** | *3 April 2025* | Higher Education | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: There's no questions that using increase productivity and makes coding interesting and fast. My students love using it in their class and it helped us save time by focusing on learning new coding techniques and capture any errors. The use of Copilot sparked creativity because now students focus on the solutions, not the codes > > **Cons**: It's not a disadvantage per se but I wouldn't recommend using it with beginners because it might students to become lazy and miss important milestones in their learning. I would delay introducing Copilot until students have a good grasps of the module and understand the basics. Also you should be aware that some of suggestions aren't free from issues and students should discuss the quality of them, whici is again not a disadvantage and might lead to some interesting conversations in class. ----- ### "From Idea to Prototype in Hours: A Solo Developer’s Secret Weapon" — 5.0/5 > **Jerrid** | *13 April 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: My preferred aspect of GitHub Copilot is its ability to significantly shorten the path from a client’s initial idea to a functional prototype. I can start with a vague concept or a concise brief, and Copilot helps me scaffold the structure, integrate core flows, and iterate directly in Visual Studio Code, all while minimizing boilerplate code. The most substantial benefit for me is its support for custom agents, sub-agents, skills, workflows, and the Model Context Protocol (MCP). It feels less like mere “auto-complete for code” and more like an adaptable toolkit tailored to my development process. For instance, I set up specialized agents for testing, refactoring, or integration tasks—ensuring the client receives a reliable, bug-free prototype more quickly—and then assemble them into repeatable workflows for new client projects. This level of customization allows me to dedicate more time to product conceptualization and strategy and less to repetitive setup. > > **Cons**: My biggest issue with GitHub Copilot is its limited support options. Even with a subscription, my main avenue for direct assistance seems to be submitting a ticket, which often takes weeks or more to get a reply. Although community forums are useful, the absence of immediate support channels like phone or live chat is very frustrating. Since Copilot plays a crucial role in accelerating my daily tasks, slow and disconnected support becomes a significant obstacle. > > Before using GitHub Copilot, developing a client prototype as a solo developer required extensive manual, repetitive work. Each project began with the same tasks: establishing the basic structure, configuring routing and navigation, creating placeholder screens, setting up build tools, and writing boilerplate code for forms, APIs, and state management. This setup often took several days before I could address the unique aspects of the client’s idea. As a result, I was limited in the number of projects I could handle each week and found it challenging to quickly present clients with tangible progress. The transition to the tool was incredibly seamless. Implementation was straightforward right out of the box; the documentation is excellent, supported by community blogs and YouTube videos. You can even use the Copilot Agent itself to guide you through the initial onboarding. Because of its flawless integration with my VS Code environment, the initial development phase is vastly more efficient. Rather than spending most of my time on scaffolding, I describe the project and have Copilot generate the initial structure. The sheer number of features—especially advanced capabilities like custom agents and sub-agents—takes this a step further. Despite the tool’s power, the ease of use remains high. I can set up agents specialized for different parts of my workflow—one focused on refactoring, another on testing, and another on integration—and chain them into repeatable workflows. For example, after getting a first version of a feature working, I can run a workflow that reviews the code, suggests refactors, and generates tests without leaving my editor. In practical terms, this has had a measurable impact on my business. Because it solves so many friction points, my frequency of use is incredibly high—I rely on it every single day. A working prototype that might have taken several days can often be produced within a day, sometimes even within a few focused hours. That means I can iterate more often with clients, sharing an early version in the next meeting or even the same day. Overall, while the direct customer support relies on a slow ticketing system (as mentioned in my dislikes), the platform itself helps me solve three massive problems: the time required for initial project scaffolding, the friction of repetitive coding, and the overhead of switching context. The ultimate benefit is a much faster idea-to-prototype cycle, more frequent feedback from clients, and a higher baseline of code quality—even as a solo developer on tight timelines. ----- ### "Great for Students\!" — 3.0/5 > **Soren** | *13 February 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: As a student, Github copilot was affortable and great in use for collaborate with my classmates. It was helpful providing adjustments to my work. > > **Cons**: The applications generation tools were not fully developed and often left me seeking other platforms like chat GPT > > GitHub Copilot is great for any student in pursuit to learn and understand more about software, to seek comprehensive solutions. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1051539/copilot?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1051539/copilot) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | ----- ## Structured Data