--- description: Discover the benefits and disadvantages of GitHub Copilot. Learn the software price, see the description, and read the most helpful reviews for UK business users. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHub Copilot Pricing, Cost & Reviews - Capterra UK 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [AI Coding Assistants](/directory/34828/ai-coding-assistants/software) > [GitHub Copilot](/software/1051539/copilot) # GitHub Copilot Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1051539/copilot Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1051539/copilot?page=2) > Copilot uses advanced AI algorithms to suggest code and entire functions to users in real-time, right from their editor. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 47 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses GitHub Copilot? Coders and Engineers ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.5/5** | 47 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Microsoft - **Location**: Redmond, US - **Founded**: 1975 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$0.00 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: United States ## Features - Content Generation - Data Augmentation - Natural Language Processing - Simulation and Scenario Generation ## Category - [AI Coding Assistants](https://www.capterra.co.uk/directory/34828/ai-coding-assistants/software) ## Related Categories - [AI Coding Assistants](https://www.capterra.co.uk/directory/34828/ai-coding-assistants/software) - [Generative AI Tools](https://www.capterra.co.uk/directory/34155/generative-ai/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Blaze](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1056061/blaze) — 4.8/5 (724 reviews) 2. [1min.AI](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1065472/1min-ai) — 4.7/5 (486 reviews) 3. [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1049484/chatgpt) — 4.4/5 (376 reviews) 4. [Replit](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1051536/replit) — 4.4/5 (158 reviews) 5. [NightCafe](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1032973/nightcafe) — 4.7/5 (85 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Great product with integrations. Highly recommend" — 5.0/5 > **Tom** | *26 March 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: GitHub Copilot gives you the option to let it write code for you, or as I do more often than not, use it to Code Review my code. The interface is easy to use and their are a good number of tokens included at the free tier. There can choose from several models including Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini and more. It also embeds nicely with VSCode and PhpStorm. Customer support is great and Microsoft recently a free workshop in London to highlight how Copilot can be utilised. > > **Cons**: I don't really find many issues with GitHub Copilot. It is a very usable product and is understood my many developers. > > Overall, I think GitHub Copilot is a great addition not only to Github itself, but to the wider community with great IDE integration. ----- ### "Game changer" — 5.0/5 > **Stuart** | *31 December 2025* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The project level overview helps a lot with explaining context. In fact it cuts out the need altogether. > > **Cons**: The fact I run out of credit and even on free tier cannot use it to generate commit messages. This would be a really cool free tier option. > > I used it when it first came out and had to describe context and the project as a whole but then they quickly gave it project awareness. I also use codex with it separately and probably just about prefer codex ----- ### "Sparks creativity and saves time" — 5.0/5 > **Amr** | *3 April 2025* | Higher Education | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: There's no questions that using increase productivity and makes coding interesting and fast. My students love using it in their class and it helped us save time by focusing on learning new coding techniques and capture any errors. The use of Copilot sparked creativity because now students focus on the solutions, not the codes > > **Cons**: It's not a disadvantage per se but I wouldn't recommend using it with beginners because it might students to become lazy and miss important milestones in their learning. I would delay introducing Copilot until students have a good grasps of the module and understand the basics. Also you should be aware that some of suggestions aren't free from issues and students should discuss the quality of them, whici is again not a disadvantage and might lead to some interesting conversations in class. ----- ### "Helpful Coding Assistant" — 4.0/5 > **Osama** | *21 January 2026* | Government Administration | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: It is very helpful for writing code and reduce the chance of repetition of code. It gives useful suggestions and helps with syntax. Good for learning new programming patterns > > **Cons**: Sometimes code suggestions do not match exact requirement. Subscription cost feels high for beginners. > > Overall experience is positive. It improves productivity and helps to speed up tasks. It is a useful assistant, especially for programmers. ----- ### "A Powerful AI Assistant That Speeds Up Everyday Development" — 4.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *21 April 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I like most about GitHub Copilot is how much it speeds up coding, especially for repetitive or boilerplate tasks. The code generation is where it really stands out—it can suggest full lines or even entire functions based on a simple comment, which saves a lot of time during development. In terms of ease of use, it’s very straightforward. It works directly inside the IDE, so you don’t have to switch tools or change your workflow. Most of the time it just feels like an advanced autocomplete that understands what you’re trying to do. From a value-for-money perspective, it’s quite good if you code regularly. Even small productivity gains add up quickly, and for developers working daily, it can easily justify the cost. Customization is another strong point. You can tailor its behavior using custom instructions or prompts to better match your coding style, team standards, or project requirements. This makes it more useful over time as it adapts to how you work. Customer support is decent, and there’s a lot of documentation and community content available. In practice, most issues can be resolved through docs or forums rather than direct support. While GitHub Copilot is mainly focused on code generation, it also helps with things like explaining code, writing tests, and generating documentation, which adds to its overall usefulness. However, features like video creation or image generation are not really its focus. Overall, it significantly improves productivity and reduces the time spent on routine coding tasks, making it a valuable tool for everyday development. > > **Cons**: One of the main downsides of GitHub Copilot is that it’s not always accurate, especially when working with more complex logic. It can sometimes suggest code that looks correct at first but needs careful review because it may contain small mistakes or assumptions that don’t fully match the context. Another issue is that it doesn’t always understand the full structure of larger codebases. In bigger projects, the suggestions can feel a bit disconnected or not fully aligned with existing architecture, which means you still need to manually adjust a lot of the output. Performance can also vary. Sometimes suggestions come instantly and are very helpful, but other times it feels less responsive or less relevant, which interrupts the flow a bit. There are also some limitations with deeper understanding of business logic or project-specific rules, so it works best as an assistant rather than something you can fully rely on. Overall, it’s useful, but it still requires a lot of developer oversight to make sure everything is correct and production-ready. > > Overall, my experience with GitHub Copilot has been very positive. It’s become a useful daily tool for speeding up development work and reducing the amount of repetitive coding I need to do. The biggest strength is definitely code generation. It helps with boilerplate code, function suggestions, and even test cases, which saves a lot of time during development. Over time, it feels like it learns the context of what you’re working on and becomes more helpful. In terms of ease of use, it’s very simple to get started. It integrates directly into the IDE, so there’s no need to change your workflow or switch between tools. It just works in the background and suggests code as you type. From a value for money perspective, it’s quite good if you code regularly. The time saved on repetitive tasks and faster development speed makes it worth the cost in most cases. Customization is also useful to some extent—you can guide its behavior with prompts or instructions, which helps it better match your coding style or project needs. Customer support is okay, but most issues are usually resolved through documentation or community discussions rather than direct support. One limitation is that it’s not always perfect with complex logic or large codebases, so you still need to carefully review and adjust the generated code. It’s best seen as an assistant rather than a replacement for actual development thinking. Features like video creation or image generation are not part of Copilot’s scope, so it’s purely focused on code-related tasks. Overall, it significantly improves productivity and makes development faster and more efficient, especially for everyday coding tasks and repetitive work. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1051539/copilot?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1051539/copilot) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | ----- ## Structured Data